18 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Chris Dalla Riva's avatar

So that’s actually what’s fascinating here. My understanding is that since this is before 1978 you couldn’t copyright the recording. Only the song. So this lawsuit is specifically about the sheet music that was submitted to the copyright office in 1973. Nothing about the recording is at play

Expand full comment
Michael's avatar

That may change the dynamic, certainly. Artists may avoid even listening to, much less covering pre-1978 songs then to be able to say truthfully they relied on the copyright office’s scrutiny of their sound recordings to avoid infringement. My most recent sound recording copyright got really complicated in a hurry, but the copyright specialist was very helpful (after a lot of back and forth) in offering an elegant solution. I was expecting faceless bureaucracy, but it was exactly the opposite. I am hopeful the Sheeran case will provide some clarity and I’m in complete agreement with you that it at least appears absurd.

Expand full comment
Chris Dalla Riva's avatar

Totally interested to see how it plays out. Gotta check out your newsletter

Expand full comment